Re: linux-next: manual merge of the trivial tree with the ext4 tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 12:57:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> diff --cc fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 2a73925,1f253a9..0000000
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@@ -561,7 -561,23 +561,7 @@@ struct ext4_new_group_data 
>   #define EXT4_IOC32_SETVERSION_OLD	FS_IOC32_SETVERSION
>   #endif
>   
> - /* Max physical block we can addres w/o extents */
>  -
>  -/*
>  - *  Mount options
>  - */
>  -struct ext4_mount_options {
>  -	unsigned long s_mount_opt;
>  -	uid_t s_resuid;
>  -	gid_t s_resgid;
>  -	unsigned long s_commit_interval;
>  -	u32 s_min_batch_time, s_max_batch_time;
>  -#ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA
>  -	int s_jquota_fmt;
>  -	char *s_qf_names[MAXQUOTAS];
>  -#endif
>  -};
>  -
> + /* Max physical block we can address w/o extents */
>   #define EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_FILE_PHYS	0xFFFFFFFF
>   
>   /*
> 
Looks correct.

Independant of this I think it would be better to define
EXT4_MAX_BLOCK_FILE_PHYS to 0xFFFFFFFFUL to have the same type on all
platforms.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux