On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 11:35 +0100, Russell King wrote: > On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:08:55PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Daniel, > > > > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:58:57 -0700 Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Yeah, exactly .. This is what I did to update my patch .. Do you want to > > > > include this, or should I update my version and my tree.. Ultimately my > > > > version has to go into Russell's tree.. > > > > > > Well, you can't really update that in your tree until after your tree is > > > merged with Russell's, right (since ALT_UP etc are not defined in your > > > tree)? In that case, I need to do the fix when I merge your tree into > > > linux-next (and so with Russell's tree). > > > > Right, I see what your saying .. Ok, thanks. > > There is another way to handle this - we shouldn't be tinkering with > the aux control register on non-ARM cores (as we don't know what the > bits on such cores do) we could view this as a bug fix, and put it > into -rc. Yeah, it does seem to fit that category .. > I'd prefer to do that - so could you send the original patch you posted > to lakml to the patch system please? Ok, I submitted it to your patch system (I'm assuming that's what you mean by "patch system above"). http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=6398/1 Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
