Hi Daniel, On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 10:00:07 -0700 Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > __v7_ca9mp_proc_info should just duplicate __v7_proc_info (the one below > it) .. Do you mean this: From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:48:25 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix build failure for legacy PMD_FLAGS [Updated with advice from Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx>: sfr] Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 10 ++++++++-- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S index 820f6ba..fc8828b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S @@ -334,10 +334,16 @@ cpu_elf_name: __v7_ca9mp_proc_info: .long 0x410fc090 @ Required ID value .long 0xff0ffff0 @ Mask for ID - .long PMD_TYPE_SECT | \ + ALT_SMP(.long \ + PMD_TYPE_SECT | \ PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \ PMD_SECT_AP_READ | \ - PMD_FLAGS + PMD_FLAGS_SMP) + ALT_UP(.long \ + PMD_TYPE_SECT | \ + PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \ + PMD_SECT_AP_READ | \ + PMD_FLAGS_UP) .long PMD_TYPE_SECT | \ PMD_SECT_XN | \ PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | \ -- 1.7.1 -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
