On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 03:08:55PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 08:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Thu, 16 Sep 2010 14:58:57 -0700 Daniel Walker <dwalker@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Yeah, exactly .. This is what I did to update my patch .. Do you want to > > > include this, or should I update my version and my tree.. Ultimately my > > > version has to go into Russell's tree.. > > > > Well, you can't really update that in your tree until after your tree is > > merged with Russell's, right (since ALT_UP etc are not defined in your > > tree)? In that case, I need to do the fix when I merge your tree into > > linux-next (and so with Russell's tree). > > Right, I see what your saying .. Ok, thanks. There is another way to handle this - we shouldn't be tinkering with the aux control register on non-ARM cores (as we don't know what the bits on such cores do) we could view this as a bug fix, and put it into -rc. I'd prefer to do that - so could you send the original patch you posted to lakml to the patch system please? -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
