On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:43, Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:58, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
>>> arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h between commit
>>> 63c361b65f6540043c4baabf1a044a45c7465858 ("m68k: use generic code for
>>> ptrace requests") from the m68k tree and commit
>>> 03a03164e8084b810e9f92906a51232d63bac72c ("m68knommu: define
>>> arch_has_single_step() and friends") from the m68knommu tree.
>>>
>>> These mostly add the same stuff but not quite :-(
>>
>> Ah sorry, my bad. I'm not yet used to the uClinux guys touching "my"
>> includes ;-)
>> So we need better coordination between us.
>>
>> IIRC, Greg's changes were inspired by Andreas' patch.
>
> Yes, largely they are.
>
>
>>> I have done a fixup (see below) and can carry it as necessary. Please
>>> check the result.
>>
>> At first sight, it looks OK. Thanks for fixing it up!
>
> Yep, looks ok from what I can see.
>
> Geert, how do you want to handle for the real linus merge?
> Do you want me to drop the changes to ptrace.h from that patch?
I can apply your patch (modified to apply on top of Andreas') to the
m68k for-linus branch.
Does that sound OK for you?
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>> diff --cc arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> index eef9309,beb2091..0000000
>>> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
>>> @@@ -86,14 -84,15 +86,18 @@@ struct switch_stack
>>> extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);
>>>
>>> /*
>>> - * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h.
>>> + * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h, which see.
>>> */
>>> + struct task_struct;
>>> +
>>> -#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
>>> -#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
>>> +#define arch_has_single_step() (1)
>>> extern void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>> extern void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
>>> +
>>> ++#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>>> +#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
>>> +extern void user_enable_block_step(struct task_struct *);
>>> + #endif
>>>
>>> #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>> #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
