On Thu, 26 Nov 2009, David Miller wrote:
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:16:07 +1100
>
> > Today's linux-next build (sparc32 defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c: In function '__atomic_add_return':
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:34: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_lock_irqsave'
> > arch/sparc/lib/atomic32.c:38: error: implicit declaration of function '__raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore'
> >
> > Caused by commit 4df286e52917c95c415400367cfd523dfbb0f93a ("sparc: Make
> > atomic locks raw") which I have reverted for today.
>
> Ho hum, that's the second iteration and it broke the build first time
> too.
>
> __raw_spin_lock_irqsave() definitions don't exist anywhere in the
> tree, I wonder what this was even build tested against?
>
> I'm reverting, and I'll be hard pressed to add new versions without
> solid proof that it doesn't break the build a third time :-)
/me blushes. Dunno what went wrong this time. Sorry.
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
