Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On 11/27/2009 06:43 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 05:43, Greg Ungerer<gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 01:58, Stephen Rothwell<sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h between commit
63c361b65f6540043c4baabf1a044a45c7465858 ("m68k: use generic code for
ptrace requests") from the m68k tree and commit
03a03164e8084b810e9f92906a51232d63bac72c ("m68knommu: define
arch_has_single_step() and friends") from the m68knommu tree.

These mostly add the same stuff but not quite :-(

Ah sorry, my bad. I'm not yet used to the uClinux guys touching "my"
includes ;-)
So we need better coordination between us.

IIRC, Greg's changes were inspired by Andreas' patch.

Yes, largely they are.


I have done a fixup (see below) and can carry it as necessary.  Please
check the result.

At first sight, it looks OK. Thanks for fixing it up!

Yep, looks ok from what I can see.

Geert, how do you want to handle for the real linus merge?
Do you want me to drop the changes to ptrace.h from that patch?

I can apply your patch (modified to apply on top of Andreas') to the
m68k for-linus branch.
Does that sound OK for you?

Yep, thats fine by me.

Regards
Greg



--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

diff --cc arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
index eef9309,beb2091..0000000
--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@@ -86,14 -84,15 +86,18 @@@ struct switch_stack
  extern void show_regs(struct pt_regs *);

  /*
  - * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h.
  + * These are defined as per linux/ptrace.h, which see.
  */
+ struct task_struct;
+
  -#ifndef CONFIG_MMU
  -#define       arch_has_single_step()  (1)
  +#define arch_has_single_step()        (1)
  extern void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
  extern void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *);
  +
++#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
  +#define arch_has_block_step() (1)
  +extern void user_enable_block_step(struct task_struct *);
+ #endif

  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer  --  Principal Engineer        EMAIL:     gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear Group, McAfee                      PHONE:       +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close,                            FAX:         +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia                WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux