On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:55:46 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Hi Rusty, > > > > > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0': > > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed' > > Still getting this ... > > > > Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances > > > of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr > > > tree? > > Since set_cpus_allowed_ptr() aleeady exists in Linus' tree, you could put > that patch in your tree, Bjorn. Actually "Len", sorry. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpo9m0A8LzPp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
