Hi Guys, On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:48:26 +0930 Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Aug 2009 05:52:27 am Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi Rusty, > > > > > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: > > > > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0': > > > drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed' Still getting this ... > > Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances > > of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr > > tree? Since set_cpus_allowed_ptr() aleeady exists in Linus' tree, you could put that patch in your tree, Bjorn. > Yep, my series removes it, at least for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=y. So one of you (at least) should apply that patch to your tree! Please? -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Attachment:
pgpyj37q8NgdY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
