On Sunday 02 August 2009 09:32:03 pm Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/acpi/osl.c: In function 'bind_to_cpu0':
> drivers/acpi/osl.c:194: error: implicit declaration of function 'set_cpus_allowed'
>
> Caused by commit 74b5820808215f65b70b05a099d6d3c969b82689 ("ACPI: bind
> workqueues to CPU 0 to avoid SMI corruption") (from the acpi tree but now
> in Linus' tree) interacting with commit
> 17e249fb40c814a72f08c1356cb47ec9f87f81a8
> ("cpumask:remove-set_cpus_allowed") from the rr tree.
>
> I have reverted that rr tree commit for today.
Here's a patch to fix this. Since Linus' tree still contains instances
of set_cpus_allowed(), I'm guessing this patch should be added to the rr
tree?
Bjorn
ACPI: remove cpumask_t usage
set_cpus_allowed() is on the way out; replace it with
set_cpus_allowed_ptr().
Reference: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/6/448
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx>
CC: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
index 5691f16..e196a75 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_os_initialize(void)
static void bind_to_cpu0(struct work_struct *work)
{
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
+ set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(0));
kfree(work);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
