At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:42:02 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > Takashi Iwai wrote: > > At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:02:48 -0800, > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> First error comes from snd_hda_eld_proc_new() not being static > >> when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. After that is fixed, the next problem is: > >> ERROR: "snd_print_pcm_rates" [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko] undefined! > >> > >> so I made a static inline version of that one too, for CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. > >> Please build/test more config variations. > >> > >> LD [M] sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_eld.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_hwdep.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_generic.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x1d): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_cmedia.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_atihdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_conexant.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_via.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> sound/pci/hda/patch_intelhdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': > >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here > >> make[4]: *** [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o] Error 1 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> cc: Wu Fengguang <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> sound/pci/hda/hda_local.h | 7 ++++++- > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Thanks, but these have been differently fixed on the latest ALSA tree. > > snd_print_pcm_*() have to be defined no matter what CONFIG_PROC_FS is. > > No problem. Just for clarification, is linux-next one day behind > your latest tree, or is linux-next using a different branch of it, > or what? The former, just due to the time zone :) thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
