Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:02:48 -0800, > Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> First error comes from snd_hda_eld_proc_new() not being static >> when CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. After that is fixed, the next problem is: >> ERROR: "snd_print_pcm_rates" [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.ko] undefined! >> >> so I made a static inline version of that one too, for CONFIG_PROC_FS=n. >> Please build/test more config variations. >> >> LD [M] sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o >> sound/pci/hda/hda_eld.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/hda_hwdep.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/hda_generic.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x1d): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_cmedia.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_analog.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_sigmatel.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_atihdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_conexant.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_via.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> sound/pci/hda/patch_intelhdmi.o: In function `snd_hda_eld_proc_new': >> (.text+0x3b): multiple definition of `snd_hda_eld_proc_new' >> sound/pci/hda/hda_codec.o:(.text+0x58): first defined here >> make[4]: *** [sound/pci/hda/snd-hda-intel.o] Error 1 >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx> >> cc: Wu Fengguang <wfg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx> >> --- >> sound/pci/hda/hda_local.h | 7 ++++++- >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Thanks, but these have been differently fixed on the latest ALSA tree. > snd_print_pcm_*() have to be defined no matter what CONFIG_PROC_FS is. No problem. Just for clarification, is linux-next one day behind your latest tree, or is linux-next using a different branch of it, or what? Thanks. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
