* Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Today I have temporarily dropped the cpus4096 tree from linux-next > > in order to integrate and test Rusty's API introducing only patch. > > Linus has said he will consider this patch for 2.6.28 if it is > > very contained and has no net effect - which is what it looks like > > (having reviewed the patch). > > > > Of course, if Linus' takes Rusty's patch, it will mean significant > > changes for the cpus4096 tree and this may be one case where > > rebasing the tree makes sense. But we should burn that bridge > > when we come to it. > > Rusty, could you please send a patch that introduces the new header > on the cpus4096 tree, without killing all the stuff that's tested in > there? Stephen, could you please re-pickup the cpus4096 branch and drop the out-of-flow patch (which is the same patch)? I've added Rusty's patch and disabled the topic that had the other, more intrusive changes - and started testing it. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
