* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi all, > > Today I have temporarily dropped the cpus4096 tree from linux-next > in order to integrate and test Rusty's API introducing only patch. > Linus has said he will consider this patch for 2.6.28 if it is very > contained and has no net effect - which is what it looks like > (having reviewed the patch). > > Of course, if Linus' takes Rusty's patch, it will mean significant > changes for the cpus4096 tree and this may be one case where > rebasing the tree makes sense. But we should burn that bridge when > we come to it. Rusty, could you please send a patch that introduces the new header on the cpus4096 tree, without killing all the stuff that's tested in there? Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
