Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 13:31:01 -0700 > ebiederm@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: > >> >> are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches >> >> floating around between Eric/Al? >> > >> > yup, it's yesterday's mainline. >> >> Does the problem happen if you disable selinux? >> >> This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous. > > yeah, adding `selinux=0' to the boot command line fixes it. The proc generic directory back structure is the same. As requested by the selinux folks. So I don't expect there is much more we can do on the /proc side. When we get the interaction bug between the VFS and /proc/net fixed I wonder if there will be some more selinux fall out. Something to think about. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
