Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 11:05:21 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > This is a pull of your tree from yesterday, ending at commit >> > fbb16e243887332dd5754e48ffe5b963378f3cd2 >> >> There's been various suggested patches by Al/Eric (added to cc) for >> /proc/net handling, but none of them have actually even been merged yet. >> So I don't think this code has changed in a while. >> >> Al, Eric, ideas? There aren't any issues I know of with normal configurations and the current proc code. > I don't think I saw it on any other test machines. > > This machine runs SELinux. Distro is FC5. >> > config: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/config-sony.txt >> > dmesg: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/dmesg-sony-without.txt >> >> That whole thing should just be a simple symlink: >> >> fs/proc/proc_net.c: proc_symlink("net", NULL, "self/net"); > > /proc/self/net looks fine. > >> are you sure it's a plain tree of mine, without any of the patches >> floating around between Eric/Al? > > yup, it's yesterday's mainline. Does the problem happen if you disable selinux? This feels like a case of selinux being over zealous. Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
