On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 13:52 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > seems pretty sane to me. We use something quite similar in -tip, with > the distinction that after a very short initial period [a few days at > most] we try to keep development branches append-only as well. Sure, I try to do that as well. But like I said, I've had a lot of churn coming from the defrag patches recently... But how do you deal with reverts, btw? Assuming you have a patch that you've pushed out already but not asked Linus to pull, what do you do? I currently use git-rebase -i and just drop the patch completely. Pekka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
