Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kmemcheck tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Ingo,
> 
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 09:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > (This would be doable and pretty painless as long as slab.git is
> > purely append-only and not rebased.)
> 
> Heh, it's not, as I never quite understood the workflow for that. But 
> that's another discussion, I suppose.

what's your current workflow, what causes the sha1's for commits to 
change frequently? Do you work with patches (i.e. it's not really a Git 
workflow at all and you regenerate the git tree all the time you export 
it from your patch queue), or do you perhaps git-rebase often to clean 
up patches?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux USB Development]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux