On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:10:31AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 10:13 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > > PS: Now, it seems to me Thomas could be the nearest. BTW, could somebody > > give me some tip, how these re-triggered interrupts are skipped on dev's > > reset before enable_irq? > > I think the correct solution is really not to resend level type > interrupts. If the interrupt line is still active, then the interrupt > comes up by itself. I'm cooking a patch for that. > > The other question is: > > Is the driver confused by the resent irq or is the chip-set unhappy > about the resend ? > > We could figure the latter out by activating the software based resend > method. Probably I miss something, but isn't there any problem with level type, when APIC re-triggers an interrupt, which is not acked by driver nor card (after some hw reset/clear)? Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
