On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 10:13 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote: > > I wanted to test them all on 2.6.22.1, but I didn't have enough time. > > I've verified only that 2.6.22.1 has the same problem. I can test it > > later, but I can report results back at beginning of next week. > > > So, everything is clear - any changes are good! > Except the signed-off ones... > > Thanks Marcin, > Jarek P. > > PS: Now, it seems to me Thomas could be the nearest. BTW, could somebody > give me some tip, how these re-triggered interrupts are skipped on dev's > reset before enable_irq? I think the correct solution is really not to resend level type interrupts. If the interrupt line is still active, then the interrupt comes up by itself. I'm cooking a patch for that. The other question is: Is the driver confused by the resent irq or is the chip-set unhappy about the resend ? We could figure the latter out by activating the software based resend method. tglx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
