Westwood performance?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I am evaluating the Westwood protocol in the lab using NISTnet as an
emulator.  So far I am seeing little to zero improvement of TCP
performance using Westwood as opposed to the Vegas implementation in the
kernel.  I have two NISTnet boxes to simulate packet loss and delay in
both the upstream and downstream path.  NISTnet is programmed to induce
500ms delay, drop 5% of packets and emulate 1Mbps bandwidth.  I'm using
iperf and sending 3.2M of data.  I am using the 2.6.12 kernel.  These
results are very disappointing as publications I've seen show much
better improvement with a high BDP (I assume bandwidth=1Mbps *
delay=500ms qualifies).  I am seeing best case 5% improvement over
Reno/Vegas.

Am I using a valid version of Westwood in this kernel?  Is there anyway
to verify that it is running, aside from cat-ing the /proc files?
Anything in /var/log/messages or elsewhere?  Or is this really the best
one can hope for with Westwood (e.g. 5% improvement)?


Tx,
Adam
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux