Re: [PATCH]: altq HFSC port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



jamal wrote:
This is probably the most contentious issue (given say current SCO
stoopidty).
Have you talked to the original author on this? I think granting you
written consent to move to GPL may be sufficient.

I talked to the original authors and they removed the advertising clause (http://orange.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/kame/kame/sys/altq/altq_hfsc.c), but they didn't want to release the code under the GPL. Various posts on linux-kernel indicate that combining GPL code with BSD code without advertising clause makes the end-product automatically be subject to the GPL, even without consent of the authors. I basically meant to ask if this is true.


cheers, jamal

PS:- i will look at the code and give you some feedback.


I'm looking forward to it.


Best regards,
Patrick

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux