Re: [PATCH]: altq HFSC port

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



   From: jamal <hadi@cyberus.ca>
   Date: 26 Jan 2004 09:46:16 -0500

   On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 07:02, Patrick McHardy wrote:
   > The last issue is the License: The altq version is released under a
   > BSD-style License without advertising clause (the original authors
   > kindly agreed to remove it). It is my understanding that this is
   > compatible with the GPL, and because the code includes some minor
   > amounts of GPL'ed code the correct License is GPL and not
   > Dual BSD/GPL. I would be glad if someone can confirm that this is
   > correct.
   
   This is probably the most contentious issue (given say current SCO
   stoopidty).
   Have you talked to the original author on this? I think granting you
   written consent to move to GPL may be sufficient.

Yes, let's get this worked out before we stuff it into the tree :)

Patrick, please ask the original author if it's OK to make your
instance of the Linux port pure GPL'd.
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux