Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on topof bonding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Ben Greear wrote:
> Dan Hollis wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Ben Greear wrote:
> >>I'd consider ignoring the HW accel unless you can prove it actually helps
> >>performance to a noticeable degree.  I have never seen results of any benchmarking
> >>related to this...
> > For gigabit ethernet, it makes a *H*U*G*E* difference.
> I'm curious to see numbers.  The VLAN shim is only inserting
> a small shim header, at at most shifting the first part of the packet
> when sent a pre-built packet.
> Maybe the hw-accel turns on tcp checksumming or something too??

That is exactly what it does. hw tcp checksumming helps a LOT at gbe rates

-Dan
-- 
[-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux