Re: [Bonding-devel] Re: [RFC][bonding] Improve VLAN support on topof bonding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Hollis wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Ben Greear wrote:

I'd consider ignoring the HW accel unless you can prove it actually helps
performance to a noticeable degree.  I have never seen results of any benchmarking
related to this...


For gigabit ethernet, it makes a *H*U*G*E* difference.

I'm curious to see numbers. The VLAN shim is only inserting a small shim header, at at most shifting the first part of the packet when sent a pre-built packet.

Maybe the hw-accel turns on tcp checksumming or something too??


-Dan


--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>       <Ben_Greear AT excite.com>
President of Candela Technologies Inc      http://www.candelatech.com
ScryMUD:  http://scry.wanfear.com     http://scry.wanfear.com/~greear


- : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux