Re: Possible memory leak in xfrm_policy_insert

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 09, 2003 at 11:40:31AM +1000, herbert wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 01:54:26AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> > 
> > I'll be more than happy to review and fixup whatever you
> > come up with.
> 
> OK, here is a patch based on my previous way with the destroyer element.
> Please let me know what you think.

Forget about that one, there is a race around the resolver where dead
objects can come back.  flow_shrink_cache is also unprotected.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux