Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> wrote: > > David S. Miller wrote: > > >Posting a patch without describing why the change is being > >made is always a bad idea. I delete such emails. I'm stupid > >and I need to be told what a patch does and why. > >- > > > > > > > Sorry, i didn't meant to waste your time. > The current ip_fragment evictor kills the oldest entry of each hash bucket > starting with 0 instead of killing the oldest entry of all buckets. This > leads > to unfair behaviour if one of the higher hash slots carries alot of > fragments. > This patch holds the frag heads in a lru queue so we can kills the least > recently used first. Each arriving fragment counts as usage. > Does this not imply that the hash isn't very good? - : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
