Re: ARP reply on behalf of another interface?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sorry. I did not check its preview.

I am using the outlook express but I can not find a way to use the fixed-font in the text area.
Instead, I add a link of my message in here:

http://www.megapass.co.kr/~cychong12/arp_rep

Thanks.
Chae-yong

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chae-yong Chong" <cychong@samsung.com>
To: <linux-net@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 1:34 PM
Subject: ARP reply on behalf of another interface?


> Hi,
> 
> I have a system which use IPOA for internal communication while use the
> ethernet interface on a node. 
> 
> +---------------------------------+---------
> |             +----+                 +----+       |
> +------- |  A   | ---------|  B   |----+
>                +----+                 +----+
>            eth0     atm0       atm0     eth0
>            1.1/24   1.2          1.3       1.4
> 
> I setup the IP address for each interface with the same subnet /24.
> When a remote node send ICMP request to IP address 1.3, the packets
> are routed through the eth0(1.4) and reach at the atm0(1.3) because 
> the eth0 acts as a proxy ARP(It responsed to ARP request which query
> the 1.3's hardware address)
> 
> From this, I guess the Linux arp reply to the ARP request which query
> one of its interface whether it is a in-device or not.
> 
> However, in this figure
> 
> +--------------------+---------
>      |        +------+        | 
>      +---- |   A      |----+
>                +------+
>            eth0         eth1
>            1.1/24      1.4
> 
> if a ARP request for 1.1 is broadcasted in the link, the ARP request packet will
> get into A through eth0 and through eth1. However, only one ARP reply will
> be sent. Why? If eth1 will do act as a proxy ARP for eth0, should the eth1 also
> send the ARP reply?(I know the linux not the eth? process/reply ARP packet,
> However the linux arp is stateless, the ARP request from eth0 and eth1 just
> differ in in-device. I assume this in-device is not important from the previous
> test).
> Why the eth1 does not send ARP reply for eth0?
> 
> In brief, what condition does linux kernel send ARP reply?
> 
> Thanks.
> Chae-yong.
> 
> -
> : send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux