Re: Performance with ethernet channel bonding

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




>Andi's message...
> There must be some misunderstanding. My point was that round robin
inherently
> leads to packet reordering (easy to see when the packets have different
lengths,
> but even with equal packet lengths small timing differences can cause
it).
> Packet reordering is bad for performance.

Ahh. Of course. I should have thought of that.

> The default 32K window is too small for fast networks (fast ethernet and
up,
> or anything with longer latency like round robin setups). You can change
it
> using the /proc/sys/net/core/[rw]mem_{default,max} sysctls (see
socket(7))

Hmm. The machine I'm running with has 65535 for [rw]mem_default &
[rw]mem_max. I assume this is a 32 bit value so I could go up to a megabyte
if needed to get the performance consistent on the bound channels. I also
assume I must make the same changes on all affected machines. I'll try some
more tests & get back with the results.

Thanks.
--Mark H Johnson
  <mailto:Mark_H_Johnson@raytheon.com>

-
: send the line "unsubscribe linux-net" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org


[Index of Archives]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux 802.1Q VLAN]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Git]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News and Information]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux