On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 6:52 PM Sergeant Peppercorn <speppercorn109@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Also, would this apply fo my 4.9.88 IMX kernel as well as the TI 3.12.10 kernel? We care only about mainline, sorry. > On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 9:51 AM Sergeant Peppercorn > <speppercorn109@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi, so are you saying that I should try to merge in these two commits > > for a proper fix for this? > > 730a43fbc135 ("mtd: nand: add nand_check_erased helper functions") > > fdf2e8210529 ("mtd: nand: gpmi: Fix failure when a erased page has a > > bitflip at BBM") No. I said you need most likely 730a43fbc135 and commits it depends on. Commit fdf2e8210529 was just an example of a related bug. > > I am assuming these are from the mainline kernel? Sure. > > If not, how do I fix this? this other patch, instead or with those two commits? > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-January/051357.html > > > > The patch doesn't seem to be able to apply cleanly to my kernel so I > > must do some deep merging. I have not looked for the two commits yet. This patch was AFAIK not applied because we decided to work around the issue in NAND core. Thanks, //richard ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/