Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] mtd: rawnand: mtk: Re-license MTK NAND driver as Dual MIT/GPL

["RogerCC.Lin" <rogercc.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 17:11 +0800, xiaolei li wrote:
> Miquel, Boris, thanks for your ACK.
> 
> On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 10:18 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:56:20 +0800
> > xiaolei li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi Rafal,
> > > 
> > > On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 17:06 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > > > On 2019-05-05 11:12, xiaolei li wrote:  
> > > > > Up to now,
> > > > > Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (the author and major 
> > > > > contributor),
> > > > > Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> (the author and
> > > > > major contributor),
> > > > > Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (developer),
> > > > > Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> (developer)
> > > > > sent ACK for this RFC patch.
> > > > > 
> > > > > May I ask if it is enough to accept this change? Or should I wait for
> > > > > other developer's response?  
> > > > 
> > > > I can't imagine re-licensing someone's work without a permission.  
> > > 
> > > I have no intention to offend other's contribution.
> > > That is why I sent this RFC patch to ask for ACKs from contributors.
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The best you can do is ignoring contributors that submitted changes that
> > > > aren't really copyrightable (something like fixing a comment typo, some
> > > > auto-generated diff-s).
> > > > 
> > > > I used following command to check mtk_nand.c file history:
> > > > # git log --follow drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | grep 
> > > > "Signed-off-by" | sort | uniq -c | sort -r -n
> > > >       19     Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >       18     Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >       15     Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon 
> > > > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        6     Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        3     Signed-off-by: RogerCC Lin <rogercc.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        2     Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal 
> > > > <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <peterpandong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada 
> > > > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >        1     Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz 
> > > > <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 
> > > > Ideally you should still get acks from:
> > > > 
> > > > 1) Miquel
> > > > Contributor of 21 changes
> > > > 
> > > > 2) Boris
> > > > Contributor of 33 changes
> > 
> > Not sure that's really necessary given the type of changes done in those
> > 33 commits (mostly mechanical changes due to modifications in the NAND
> > framework), but here is my
> > 
> > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > 3) RogerCC
> > > > Contributor of 3 changes:
> > > > 98dea8d71931 ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support MT7622 NAND flash controller.")
> > > > b45ee5501ede ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support different MTK NAND flash 
> > > > controller IP")
> > > > 559e58e7ed2d ("mtd: nand: fix chances to create incomplete ECC data when 
> > > > writing")
> > > > 
Acked-by: RogerCC Lin <rogercc.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > 4) Wei
> > > > Contributor of 1 change:
> > > > 07f76443ef81 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: remove redundant dev_err call in 
> > > > mtk_nfc_probe()")
> > > > 
> > > > 5) Peter
> > > > Contributor of 1 change:
> > > > d4092d76a4a4 ("mtd: nand: Rename nand.h into rawnand.h")
> > > > 
> > > > 6) Masahiro
> > > > Contributor of 1 change:
> > > > f0dbe4aa35e7 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: return error code of 
> > > > nand_scan_ident/tail() on error")
> > > > 
> > > > I guess we could accept your patch without acks from Wei, Peter and 
> > > > Masahiro.
> > > > 
> > > > You definitely need an approval from Miquel, Boris and RogerCC.
> > > > 
> > > > It doesn't seem you took this re-licensing task too seriously.
> > > > 
> > > > Please pay more attention to this licensing problem, you can start with 
> > > > doing
> > > > a similar research for mtk_ecc.c and mtk_ecc.h.  
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your ACK and good suggestion. It is really helpful for me.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Xiaolei
> > > 
> > 
> 



______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/