Miquel, Boris, thanks for your ACK. On Mon, 2019-05-06 at 10:18 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:56:20 +0800 > xiaolei li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hi Rafal, > > > > On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 17:06 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > > On 2019-05-05 11:12, xiaolei li wrote: > > > > Up to now, > > > > Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (the author and major > > > > contributor), > > > > Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> (the author and > > > > major contributor), > > > > Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (developer), > > > > Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> (developer) > > > > sent ACK for this RFC patch. > > > > > > > > May I ask if it is enough to accept this change? Or should I wait for > > > > other developer's response? > > > > > > I can't imagine re-licensing someone's work without a permission. > > > > I have no intention to offend other's contribution. > > That is why I sent this RFC patch to ask for ACKs from contributors. > > > > > > > > The best you can do is ignoring contributors that submitted changes that > > > aren't really copyrightable (something like fixing a comment typo, some > > > auto-generated diff-s). > > > > > > I used following command to check mtk_nand.c file history: > > > # git log --follow drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | grep > > > "Signed-off-by" | sort | uniq -c | sort -r -n > > > 19 Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 18 Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 15 Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 6 Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 3 Signed-off-by: RogerCC Lin <rogercc.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 2 Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > > > <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <peterpandong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > > > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > 1 Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz > > > <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Ideally you should still get acks from: > > > > > > 1) Miquel > > > Contributor of 21 changes > > > > > > 2) Boris > > > Contributor of 33 changes > > Not sure that's really necessary given the type of changes done in those > 33 commits (mostly mechanical changes due to modifications in the NAND > framework), but here is my > > Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > 3) RogerCC > > > Contributor of 3 changes: > > > 98dea8d71931 ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support MT7622 NAND flash controller.") > > > b45ee5501ede ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support different MTK NAND flash > > > controller IP") > > > 559e58e7ed2d ("mtd: nand: fix chances to create incomplete ECC data when > > > writing") > > > > > > 4) Wei > > > Contributor of 1 change: > > > 07f76443ef81 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: remove redundant dev_err call in > > > mtk_nfc_probe()") > > > > > > 5) Peter > > > Contributor of 1 change: > > > d4092d76a4a4 ("mtd: nand: Rename nand.h into rawnand.h") > > > > > > 6) Masahiro > > > Contributor of 1 change: > > > f0dbe4aa35e7 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: return error code of > > > nand_scan_ident/tail() on error") > > > > > > I guess we could accept your patch without acks from Wei, Peter and > > > Masahiro. > > > > > > You definitely need an approval from Miquel, Boris and RogerCC. > > > > > > It doesn't seem you took this re-licensing task too seriously. > > > > > > Please pay more attention to this licensing problem, you can start with > > > doing > > > a similar research for mtk_ecc.c and mtk_ecc.h. > > > > Thanks for your ACK and good suggestion. It is really helpful for me. > > > > Thanks, > > Xiaolei > > > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/