On Mon, 6 May 2019 08:56:20 +0800 xiaolei li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Rafal, > > On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 17:06 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > > On 2019-05-05 11:12, xiaolei li wrote: > > > Up to now, > > > Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (the author and major > > > contributor), > > > Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> (the author and > > > major contributor), > > > Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (developer), > > > Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> (developer) > > > sent ACK for this RFC patch. > > > > > > May I ask if it is enough to accept this change? Or should I wait for > > > other developer's response? > > > > I can't imagine re-licensing someone's work without a permission. > > I have no intention to offend other's contribution. > That is why I sent this RFC patch to ask for ACKs from contributors. > > > > > The best you can do is ignoring contributors that submitted changes that > > aren't really copyrightable (something like fixing a comment typo, some > > auto-generated diff-s). > > > > I used following command to check mtk_nand.c file history: > > # git log --follow drivers/mtd/nand/raw/mtk_nand.c | grep > > "Signed-off-by" | sort | uniq -c | sort -r -n > > 19 Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > 18 Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > 15 Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 6 Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Li <xiaolei.li@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 3 Signed-off-by: RogerCC Lin <rogercc.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 2 Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal > > <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@xxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Peter Pan <peterpandong@xxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada > > <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > 1 Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz > > <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Ideally you should still get acks from: > > > > 1) Miquel > > Contributor of 21 changes > > > > 2) Boris > > Contributor of 33 changes Not sure that's really necessary given the type of changes done in those 33 commits (mostly mechanical changes due to modifications in the NAND framework), but here is my Acked-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > 3) RogerCC > > Contributor of 3 changes: > > 98dea8d71931 ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support MT7622 NAND flash controller.") > > b45ee5501ede ("mtd: nand: mtk: Support different MTK NAND flash > > controller IP") > > 559e58e7ed2d ("mtd: nand: fix chances to create incomplete ECC data when > > writing") > > > > 4) Wei > > Contributor of 1 change: > > 07f76443ef81 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: remove redundant dev_err call in > > mtk_nfc_probe()") > > > > 5) Peter > > Contributor of 1 change: > > d4092d76a4a4 ("mtd: nand: Rename nand.h into rawnand.h") > > > > 6) Masahiro > > Contributor of 1 change: > > f0dbe4aa35e7 ("mtd: nand: mediatek: return error code of > > nand_scan_ident/tail() on error") > > > > I guess we could accept your patch without acks from Wei, Peter and > > Masahiro. > > > > You definitely need an approval from Miquel, Boris and RogerCC. > > > > It doesn't seem you took this re-licensing task too seriously. > > > > Please pay more attention to this licensing problem, you can start with > > doing > > a similar research for mtk_ecc.c and mtk_ecc.h. > > Thanks for your ACK and good suggestion. It is really helpful for me. > > Thanks, > Xiaolei > ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/