On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:59:56 +0100 Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24.01.19 12:14, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:57:33 +0100 > > Stefan Roese <sr@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On 24.01.19 10:19, Boris Brezillon wrote: > >> > >> <snip> > >> > >>>> So spi_mem_dirmap_read() returns -EINVAL to spinand_write_to_cache_op() > >>>> which then returns -EIO. > >>> > >>> Can you try with the following diff applied? > >>> --->8--- > >>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > >>> index 52f17fc42daa..67c568f0c47f 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > >>> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > >>> > >>> while (nbytes) { > >>> ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf); > >>> - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > >>> + if (!ret || (ret > 0 && ret > nbytes)) > >>> ret = -EIO; > >>> > >>> if (ret < 0) > >>> @@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > >>> wdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].wdesc; > >>> > >>> while (nbytes) { > >>> - ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(wdesc, column, nbytes, > >>> - spinand->databuf + column); > >>> - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > >>> + ret = spi_mem_dirmap_write(wdesc, column, nbytes, > >>> + spinand->databuf + column); > >>> + if (!ret || (ret > 0 && ret > nbytes)) > >>> ret = -EIO; > >>> > >>> if (ret < 0) > >>> @@ -761,21 +761,6 @@ static void spinand_destroy_dirmaps(struct spinand_device *spinand) > >>> spinand_destroy_dirmap(spinand, i); > >>> } > >>> > >>> -const struct spi_mem_op * > >>> -spinand_find_supported_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > >>> - const struct spi_mem_op *ops, > >>> - unsigned int nops) > >>> -{ > >>> - unsigned int i; > >>> - > >>> - for (i = 0; i < nops; i++) { > >>> - if (spi_mem_supports_op(spinand->spimem, &ops[i])) > >>> - return &ops[i]; > >>> - } > >>> - > >>> - return NULL; > >>> -} > >>> - > >>> static const struct nand_ops spinand_ops = { > >>> .erase = spinand_erase, > >>> .markbad = spinand_markbad, > >>> > >> > >> Sure. Here some logs: > >> > >> root@mt7688:~# ./nandbiterrs /dev/mtd5 -i > >> incremental biterrors test > >> ECC failure, invalid data despite read success > > > > Okay, so now we're back to a problem in the read path. Looks like the > > buf pointer passed to spi_mem_dirmap_read() is only valid for the first > > iteration of the "while (nbytes)" loop. > > > > Can you try with this diff (and sorry for asking you to debug/test that, > > but I no longer have access to a device with a SPI NAND)? > > > > --->8--- > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > > index 52f17fc42daa..90da21b52bb5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > > @@ -237,13 +237,14 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > rdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].rdesc; > > > > while (nbytes) { > > - ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf); > > - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > > - ret = -EIO; > > - > > + ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf + column); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > + if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > > + return -EIO; > > + > > + > > nbytes -= ret; > > column += ret; > > } > > @@ -296,14 +297,14 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > wdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].wdesc; > > > > while (nbytes) { > > - ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(wdesc, column, nbytes, > > - spinand->databuf + column); > > - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > > - ret = -EIO; > > - > > + ret = spi_mem_dirmap_write(wdesc, column, nbytes, > > + spinand->databuf + column); > > if (ret < 0) > > return ret; > > > > + if (!ret || ret > nbytes) > > + return -EIO; > > + > > nbytes -= ret; > > column += ret; > > } > > @@ -761,21 +762,6 @@ static void spinand_destroy_dirmaps(struct spinand_device *spinand) > > spinand_destroy_dirmap(spinand, i); > > } > > > > -const struct spi_mem_op * > > -spinand_find_supported_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > - const struct spi_mem_op *ops, > > - unsigned int nops) > > -{ > > - unsigned int i; > > - > > - for (i = 0; i < nops; i++) { > > - if (spi_mem_supports_op(spinand->spimem, &ops[i])) > > - return &ops[i]; > > - } > > - > > - return NULL; > > -} > > - > > static const struct nand_ops spinand_ops = { > > .erase = spinand_erase, > > .markbad = spinand_markbad, > > > > Not good at all, I'm afraid: > > root@mt7688:~# ./nandbiterrs /dev/mtd5 -i > [ 161.408159] nand: attempt to erase a bad/reserved block @0 > libmtd: error!: MEMERASE64 ioctl failed for eraseblock 0 (mtd5) > error 5 (Input/output error) > Cannot erase block 0 > > root@mt7688:~# cat /sys/class/mtd/mtd5/bad_blocks > 992 > > Without this last patch, I only have 2 bad blocks: > > root@mt7688:~# cat /sys/class/mtd/mtd5/bad_blocks > 2 > > As it seems, adding "column" to the buffer address is not a good > idea. Here a short log with some debugging: Oh, you're right, buf points to the OOB portion in case of OOB-only accesses. > > [ 27.721104] spinand_read_from_cache_op (241): ret=32 nbytes=128 column=2048 > > This small patch below of your last one, seems to fix this issue > for me: > > root@mt7688:~# cat /sys/class/mtd/mtd5/bad_blocks > 2 > root@mt7688:~# ./nandbiterrs /dev/mtd5 -i > incremental biterrors test > Successfully corrected 0 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 1/7 > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 1 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 3/7 > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 2 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 5/7 > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 3 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 7/7 > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 4 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 8/7 > Read reported 5 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 5 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 10/7 > Read reported 6 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 6 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 12/7 > Read reported 7 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 7 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 14/7 > Read reported 8 corrected bit errors > Successfully corrected 8 bit errors per subpage > Inserted biterror @ 17/7 > Failed to recover 1 bitflips > Read error after 9 bit errors per page > > What do you think? Could you fold it into your patch if its > acceptable? Actually, I asked Miquel to drop/revert the initial patch, so I'll squash whatever makes it work for you in the original commit and send a new version. > > Thanks, > Stefan > > --->8--- > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > index 659a0e716ee0..a5ccd4adc30f 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c > @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > unsigned int nbytes = 0; > void *buf = NULL; > u16 column = 0; > + int offs = 0; > ssize_t ret; > > if (req->datalen) { > @@ -237,7 +238,7 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > rdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].rdesc; > > while (nbytes) { > - ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf + column); > + ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf + offs); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > @@ -246,6 +247,7 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > nbytes -= ret; > column += ret; > + offs += ret; How about incrementing buf directly? buf += ret; > } > > if (req->datalen) > @@ -273,6 +275,7 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand); > struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *wdesc; > unsigned int nbytes, column = 0; > + int offs = 0; > ssize_t ret; > > nbytes = nanddev_page_size(nand) + nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); > @@ -297,7 +300,7 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > while (nbytes) { > ret = spi_mem_dirmap_write(wdesc, column, nbytes, > - spinand->databuf + column); > + spinand->databuf + offs); In the write case 'spinand->databuf + column' works because we always write the page entirely, but making the write path consistent with the read one is a good thing, so let's add a buf pointer. > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > > @@ -306,6 +309,7 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, > > nbytes -= ret; > column += ret; > + offs += ret; > } > > return 0; How about the following diff (hopefully the last one :-))? --->8--- diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c index 52f17fc42daa..98e4ad74df7f 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c @@ -238,14 +238,16 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, while (nbytes) { while (nbytes) { ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf); - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) - ret = -EIO; - if (ret < 0) return ret; + if (!ret || ret > nbytes) + return -EIO; + + nbytes -= ret; column += ret; + buf += ret; } if (req->datalen) @@ -273,6 +275,7 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, struct mtd_info *mtd = nanddev_to_mtd(nand); struct spi_mem_dirmap_desc *wdesc; unsigned int nbytes, column = 0; + void *buf = spinand->databuf; ssize_t ret; nbytes = nanddev_page_size(nand) + nanddev_per_page_oobsize(nand); @@ -296,16 +299,16 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, wdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].wdesc; while (nbytes) { - ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(wdesc, column, nbytes, - spinand->databuf + column); - if (!ret || ret > nbytes) - ret = -EIO; - + ret = spi_mem_dirmap_write(wdesc, column, nbytes, buf); if (ret < 0) return ret; + if (!ret || ret > nbytes) + return -EIO; + nbytes -= ret; column += ret; + buf += ret; } return 0; @@ -761,21 +764,6 @@ static void spinand_destroy_dirmaps(struct spinand_device *spinand) spinand_destroy_dirmap(spinand, i); } -const struct spi_mem_op * -spinand_find_supported_op(struct spinand_device *spinand, - const struct spi_mem_op *ops, - unsigned int nops) -{ - unsigned int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nops; i++) { - if (spi_mem_supports_op(spinand->spimem, &ops[i])) - return &ops[i]; - } - - return NULL; -} - static const struct nand_ops spinand_ops = { .erase = spinand_erase, .markbad = spinand_markbad, ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/