Re: [PATCH] mtd: spinand: Add support for GigaDevice GD5F1GQ4UC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 24.01.19 10:19, Boris Brezillon wrote:

<snip>

So spi_mem_dirmap_read() returns -EINVAL to spinand_write_to_cache_op()
which then returns -EIO.

Can you try with the following diff applied?
--->8---
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
index 52f17fc42daa..67c568f0c47f 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ static int spinand_read_from_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand,
while (nbytes) {
                 ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(rdesc, column, nbytes, buf);
-               if (!ret || ret > nbytes)
+               if (!ret || (ret > 0 && ret > nbytes))
                         ret = -EIO;
if (ret < 0)
@@ -296,9 +296,9 @@ static int spinand_write_to_cache_op(struct spinand_device *spinand,
         wdesc = spinand->dirmaps[req->pos.plane].wdesc;
while (nbytes) {
-               ret = spi_mem_dirmap_read(wdesc, column, nbytes,
-                                         spinand->databuf + column);
-               if (!ret || ret > nbytes)
+               ret = spi_mem_dirmap_write(wdesc, column, nbytes,
+                                          spinand->databuf + column);
+               if (!ret || (ret > 0 && ret > nbytes))
                         ret = -EIO;
if (ret < 0)
@@ -761,21 +761,6 @@ static void spinand_destroy_dirmaps(struct spinand_device *spinand)
                 spinand_destroy_dirmap(spinand, i);
  }
-const struct spi_mem_op *
-spinand_find_supported_op(struct spinand_device *spinand,
-                         const struct spi_mem_op *ops,
-                         unsigned int nops)
-{
-       unsigned int i;
-
-       for (i = 0; i < nops; i++) {
-               if (spi_mem_supports_op(spinand->spimem, &ops[i]))
-                       return &ops[i];
-       }
-
-       return NULL;
-}
-
  static const struct nand_ops spinand_ops = {
         .erase = spinand_erase,
         .markbad = spinand_markbad,


Sure. Here some logs:

root@mt7688:~# ./nandbiterrs /dev/mtd5 -i
incremental biterrors test
ECC failure, invalid data despite read success
root@mt7688:~# flash_erase /dev/mtd5 0 1
Erasing 128 Kibyte @ 0 -- 100 % complete
root@mt7688:~# nandwrite --input-size=2048 /dev/mtd5 /dev/urandom
Writing data to block 0 at offset 0x0
root@mt7688:~# ./nandbiterrs /dev/mtd5 -o
overwrite biterrors test
ECC failure, invalid data despite read success
Bit error histogram (0 operations total):

Thanks,
Stefan

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/



[Index of Archives]     [LARTC]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Photo]

  Powered by Linux