On Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:40:50 +0100 Boris Brezillon <bbrezillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This definitely does look better. I assume that we are we on the > > right track now? > > Yep, and it confirms the ECC caps => 8bits/512bytes. Will send a proper > commit for the fix I did and Cc you so you can add your > Tested-by/Reviewed-by. Oh, looks like a side-effect of migrating to the dirmap approach (merged in nand/next [1]) is that this bug does not exist. Can you test the nand/next branch and let me know if it still works? [1]http://git.infradead.org/linux-mtd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/nand/next ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/