On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:20:41PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > Hi Luis, > > > > As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split > > optional code out of core module support code into separate components. > > This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or > > modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts. > > > > Changes since v1 [2]: > > Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix, > rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my > modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again? Linus now merged the fix in question, just be sure to use his latest tree, it should include 67d6212afda218d564890d1674bab28e8612170f > I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to > rebase on top of that. If you can fix the issues from your patches which Christophe mentioned that would be great. Then I'll apply then and then Christophe can work off of that. > Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next. Luis
