Hello, On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:20:41PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote: > > Hi Luis, > > > > As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split > > optional code out of core module support code into separate components. > > This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or > > modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts. > > > > Changes since v1 [2]: > > Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix, > rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my > modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again? > > I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to > rebase on top of that. > > Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next. Sounds like a good idea. When rebasing on top of 5.17-rc1 the only conflict was on the module code. Thanks Michal
