On 6/24/09, Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan Jenkins napsal(a): >> Michal Marek wrote: >>> Jon Masters napsal(a): >>> >>>> Ok, I tested the different trees I was sent and then redid the master >>>> tree just now. But I'm not finished fixing the breakage introduced in >>>> merging the latest bits from Michal Marek - so give it a few hours as >>>> I'm going to sleep now before I finish it up. >>>> >>> >>> Ah, I didn't know you already merged them. I would happily rebase my >>> patches on top of Andreas' and Alan's changes if you asked me to :). >>> >>> Michal >>> >> >> I'm not sure that's the problem. The patches are applied to Jons tree, >> but the tests fail (tests/runtests -vv). I bisected it to "elfops: >> cleanup load_symbols()". > > It fails to find the exported symbol in tests/data/src/export_dep.c, > which does it the old, pre-2.5.59 way (symbol names in the kernel_symbol > struct directly). My patch removes support for that, so the failure > isn't surprising here :-). Do we still care about such old kernels, or > can I update the test? Go ahead. Jon removed back-compat for the "stable" 2.4 kernels, I'm sure he's happy to drop cruft that only existed in the "unstable" 2.5 series. And feel free to re-run the test to check for any other breakages :-). Thanks Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-modules" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
