On 24/01/23 13:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 24/01/2023 06:44, rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> This reverts commit ab991c05c42853f0b6110022db9bf30fcc6323dd. > > Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people > and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older > kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base > your patches on recent Linux kernel. > >> >> Revert Thunder Bay specific code as the product got cancelled >> and there are no end customers. >> >> Signed-off-by: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>wq > > Stray characters. > >> --- >> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml | 25 ------------------- >> 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >> index 4053de758db6..0d5d21dd30bb 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >> @@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ properties: >> description: >> For this device it is strongly suggested to include >> arasan,soc-ctl-syscon. >> - - items: >> - - const: intel,thunderbay-sdhci-5.1 # Intel Thunder Bay eMMC PHY >> - - const: arasan,sdhci-5.1 > > Instead should be made rather deprecated, unless you are sure there is > no single person in the world using the bindings (e.g. with BSD or > bootloader)? I am sorry but this is not clear to me. As I understand it, the hardware was never released, so the binding serves no purpose. Should it be removed or "deprecated"?
