On 09/03/2023 15:12, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 24/01/23 13:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 24/01/2023 06:44, rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: "A, Rashmi" <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> This reverts commit ab991c05c42853f0b6110022db9bf30fcc6323dd. >> >> Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people >> and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older >> kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base >> your patches on recent Linux kernel. >> >>> >>> Revert Thunder Bay specific code as the product got cancelled >>> and there are no end customers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Reviewed-by: Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>wq >> >> Stray characters. >> >>> --- >>> .../devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml | 25 ------------------- >>> 1 file changed, 25 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >>> index 4053de758db6..0d5d21dd30bb 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/arasan,sdhci.yaml >>> @@ -88,12 +88,6 @@ properties: >>> description: >>> For this device it is strongly suggested to include >>> arasan,soc-ctl-syscon. >>> - - items: >>> - - const: intel,thunderbay-sdhci-5.1 # Intel Thunder Bay eMMC PHY >>> - - const: arasan,sdhci-5.1 >> >> Instead should be made rather deprecated, unless you are sure there is >> no single person in the world using the bindings (e.g. with BSD or >> bootloader)? > > I am sorry but this is not clear to me. As I understand it, > the hardware was never released, so the binding serves no > purpose. Should it be removed or "deprecated"? Hm, commit msg said cancelled and I understood that it was released and then got cancelled. But indeed maybe just remove it. Best regards, Krzysztof
