Hey William,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/02/2023 11:29, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 15/02/2023 12:32, William Qiu wrote:
> >>> Add documentation to describe StarFive System Controller Registers.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: William Qiu <william.qiu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve.
Could you please submit a v5 of this, with the bits below fixed,
whenever Hal sends their next version of the base dts series?
There's no maintainers coverage for a soc/starfive subdirectory of
dt-bindings yet, so please CC conor@xxxxxxxxxx &
linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on the patch.
Thanks,
Conor.
> >>
> >>> +properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + items:
> >>> + - enum:
> >>> + - starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon
> >>> + - starfive,jh7110-sys-syscon
> >>> + - starfive,jh7110-aon-syscon
> >>
> >> Maybe keep them ordered alphabetically?
> >>
> >>> + - const: syscon
> >>> +
> >>> + reg:
> >>> + maxItems: 1
> >>> +
> >>> +required:
> >>> + - compatible
> >>> + - reg
> >>> +
> >>> +additionalProperties: false
> >>> +
> >>> +examples:
> >>> + - |
> >>> + syscon@10240000 {
> >>> + compatible = "starfive,jh7110-stg-syscon", "syscon";
> >>> + reg = <0x10240000 0x1000>;
> >>> + };
> >>
> >> Keep only one example. All others are the same.
> >
> > With these fixed:
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > @Krzysztof, I assume the location of the binding is okay with you since
> > you didn't object to it & I suppose this one is up to me to apply if so.
>
> Yeah, generic sysreg devices go to soc. If their primary functions were
> different (e.g. clock controller which also is syscon), then they should
> go to respective directories, but it's not the case here, I think.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
