On 25-10-21, 05:46, A, Rashmi wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4:05 PM > > To: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek > > <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > > ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kishon <kishon@xxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark > > Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; kris.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhou, Furong > > <furong.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > > <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; Hunter, Adrian > > <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Vaidya, Mahesh R > > <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx>; Srikandan, Nandhini > > <nandhini.srikandan@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support of eMMC PHY for Intel Thunder Bay > > > > On 04-10-21, 06:04, A, Rashmi wrote: > > > > > Applied patch1 and patch2 for next, thus leaving the phy changes in > > > patch3 and patch 4 for Kishon/Vinod to pick up. > > > > > > Thanks and kind regards > > > Uffe > > > > > > > > > Thanks Uffe, > > > Hi Kishon/Vinod, > > > Please let me know if you have any comments > > > > Need ack from Rob on binding patch > > > > -- > > ~Vinod > > Hi Rob Herring, > Please help to review the eMMC dt-binding patches Just realised, neither Rob nor the DT list is in CC, ofcourse he would not have seen this. Please rebase and repost with Rob and DT list in CC! -- ~Vinod