> -----Original Message----- > From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, October 5, 2021 4:05 PM > To: A, Rashmi <rashmi.a@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Michal Simek > <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-mmc <linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux > ARM <linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kishon <kishon@xxxxxx>; Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Mark > Gross <mgross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; kris.pan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhou, Furong > <furong.zhou@xxxxxxxxx>; Sangannavar, Mallikarjunappa > <mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@xxxxxxxxx>; Hunter, Adrian > <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx>; Vaidya, Mahesh R > <mahesh.r.vaidya@xxxxxxxxx>; Srikandan, Nandhini > <nandhini.srikandan@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add support of eMMC PHY for Intel Thunder Bay > > On 04-10-21, 06:04, A, Rashmi wrote: > > > Applied patch1 and patch2 for next, thus leaving the phy changes in > > patch3 and patch 4 for Kishon/Vinod to pick up. > > > > Thanks and kind regards > > Uffe > > > > > > Thanks Uffe, > > Hi Kishon/Vinod, > > Please let me know if you have any comments > > Need ack from Rob on binding patch > > -- > ~Vinod Hi Rob Herring, Please help to review the eMMC dt-binding patches -Rashmi
