On 25 November 2014 at 18:28, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24 November 2014 at 13:29, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 24 November 2014 at 17:24, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 24 November 2014 at 11:45, Vincent Yang >>> <vincent.yang.fujitsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> 2014-11-24 17:54 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> On 21 November 2014 at 01:51, Vincent Yang >>>>> <vincent.yang.fujitsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> Fujitsu have an sdhci IP which is implemented in a SoC we're >>>>>> adding to mainline, the most recent series for that was sent >>>>>> here: >>>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304522.html >>>>>> >>>>>> These patches are against v3.18-rc5 mainline and tested on >>>>>> v3.18-rc5 integration tree. >>>>>> >>>>>> We welcome any comment and advice about how to make any >>>>>> improvements or better align them with upstream. >>>>> >>>>> Apparently, there's a dependency between this patchset and the upper >>>>> one you refereed to. That's a problem. >>>> >>>> This patchset does not require anything from the upper one I refereed to. >>> >>> No, but the upper depends on this patchset. >>> >>> Why can't you send the mmc patches separately in one patchset? That's >>> would be easier to handle and review. >>> >> To be clear, the arch patchset introduces support for a new Fujitsu's >> platform and has a sdhci controller driver named sdhci_f_sdh30.c which >> will use 'general' improvements introduced by this patchset. >> >> I would think the controller driver has more dependency on ARCH than >> this patchset. IOW, sdhci_f_sdh30.c can't get upstream without arch >> patches but this patchset can without the sdhci_f_sdh30.c driver. Is >> that not so? > > Nope. I fail to see why there should be an ARCH dependency, there shouldn't! > > Well, I did note that to build the new driver it depended on > ARCH_MB86S7X. Let's just remove that, because it's not needed. > I suspected build-bots might complain for non-arm configs. And do we want to allow building Fujitsu controller driver even if ARCH_MB86S7X is not enabled? Vincent, lets remove ARCH_MB86S7X dependency and include the driver in this patchset as Ulf wants. Thanks, Jassi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
