2014-11-24 17:54 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 21 November 2014 at 01:51, Vincent Yang > <vincent.yang.fujitsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Fujitsu have an sdhci IP which is implemented in a SoC we're >> adding to mainline, the most recent series for that was sent >> here: >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304522.html >> >> These patches are against v3.18-rc5 mainline and tested on >> v3.18-rc5 integration tree. >> >> We welcome any comment and advice about how to make any >> improvements or better align them with upstream. > > Apparently, there's a dependency between this patchset and the upper > one you refereed to. That's a problem. This patchset does not require anything from the upper one I refereed to. The only reason we mentioned it is to show that this sdhci IP driver will have something using it shortly in the kernel. > > Preferably, try to remove the dependency and send all mmc patches to > the mmc list. If that's not possible, you need to send these two > patchsets as one instead. > >> >> Thanks. >> >> Vincent Yang (4): >> mmc: sdhci: add a voltage switch callback function >> mmc: sdhci: add a quirk for tuning work around >> mmc: sdhci: add a quirk for single block transactions >> mmc: core: hold SD Clock before CMD11 during Signal > > The last one I consider as a separate fix for mmc core. I will apply > it to my mmc tree. Thanks! Thank you and kind regards, Vincent > > Thanks and kind regards > Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
