On 24 November 2014 at 13:29, Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 24 November 2014 at 17:24, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 24 November 2014 at 11:45, Vincent Yang >> <vincent.yang.fujitsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 2014-11-24 17:54 GMT+08:00 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx>: >>>> On 21 November 2014 at 01:51, Vincent Yang >>>> <vincent.yang.fujitsu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Fujitsu have an sdhci IP which is implemented in a SoC we're >>>>> adding to mainline, the most recent series for that was sent >>>>> here: >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-November/304522.html >>>>> >>>>> These patches are against v3.18-rc5 mainline and tested on >>>>> v3.18-rc5 integration tree. >>>>> >>>>> We welcome any comment and advice about how to make any >>>>> improvements or better align them with upstream. >>>> >>>> Apparently, there's a dependency between this patchset and the upper >>>> one you refereed to. That's a problem. >>> >>> This patchset does not require anything from the upper one I refereed to. >> >> No, but the upper depends on this patchset. >> >> Why can't you send the mmc patches separately in one patchset? That's >> would be easier to handle and review. >> > To be clear, the arch patchset introduces support for a new Fujitsu's > platform and has a sdhci controller driver named sdhci_f_sdh30.c which > will use 'general' improvements introduced by this patchset. > > I would think the controller driver has more dependency on ARCH than > this patchset. IOW, sdhci_f_sdh30.c can't get upstream without arch > patches but this patchset can without the sdhci_f_sdh30.c driver. Is > that not so? Nope. I fail to see why there should be an ARCH dependency, there shouldn't! Well, I did note that to build the new driver it depended on ARCH_MB86S7X. Let's just remove that, because it's not needed. Kind regards Uffe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html