On 28/10/14 12:18, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014 12:05:30 Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 28/10/14 11:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 28 October 2014 10:37:20 Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> static int sdhci_acpi_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
>>>> {
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> + struct sdhci_acpi_host *c = sdhci_priv(host);
>>>> + struct device *dev = &c->pdev->dev;
>>>> + int err = -1;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (c->dma_setup)
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) {
>>>> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA) {
>>>> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set 64-bit DMA mask\n");
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (err)
>>>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>>>> +
>>>> + c->dma_setup = !err;
>>>> +
>>>> + return err;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think it's worth a dev_warn() message (maybe dev_info), there is nothing
>>
>> It is worth a dev_warn because 32-bit DMA can allocate memory for bounce
>> buffers which jeopardizes memory reclaim.
>
> Then you should also warn if SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA isn't or if
> SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA is set I guess.
The warning is for when the controller supports 64-bit, not when it doesn't.
>
>>> wrong in this case, but you probably have to clear the SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA to
>>> ensure that the driver won't try to to use the 64-bit DMA if the mask is not set.
>>
>> 64-bit DMA will work with a 32-bit DMA mask so there is no need.
>
> Wouldn't that at least be (slightly) less efficient? You end up having to do
> two expensive MMIO register accesses each time you transfer an address.
I doubt it is measureable and I don't want to optimize a degenerate case anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
