On 28/10/14 11:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 October 2014 10:37:20 Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> static int sdhci_acpi_enable_dma(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> {
>> - return 0;
>> + struct sdhci_acpi_host *c = sdhci_priv(host);
>> + struct device *dev = &c->pdev->dev;
>> + int err = -1;
>> +
>> + if (c->dma_setup)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> + if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) {
>> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA) {
>> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
>> + } else {
>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
>> + if (err)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set 64-bit DMA mask\n");
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (err)
>> + err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> +
>> + c->dma_setup = !err;
>> +
>> + return err;
>> }
>>
>
> I don't think it's worth a dev_warn() message (maybe dev_info), there is nothing
It is worth a dev_warn because 32-bit DMA can allocate memory for bounce
buffers which jeopardizes memory reclaim.
> wrong in this case, but you probably have to clear the SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA to
> ensure that the driver won't try to to use the 64-bit DMA if the mask is not set.
64-bit DMA will work with a 32-bit DMA mask so there is no need.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
