On Tuesday 21 October 2014 13:45:20 Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/10/14 12:33, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 October 2014 12:26:23 Adrian Hunter wrote:
> >> + return 0;
> >> +
> >> + if (host->flags & SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA) {
> >> + if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_BROKEN_64_BIT_DMA) {
> >> + host->flags &= ~SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA;
> >> + } else {
> >> + err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev,
> >> + DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> >> + if (err)
> >> + dev_warn(dev, "Failed to set 64-bit DMA mask\n");
> >> + }
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (err)
> >> + err = dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> >> +
> >> + c->dma_setup = !err;
> >>
> >
> > Never use dma_coerce_mask_and_coherent(), it will ignore limitations of
> > the upstream bus. Use dma_set_mask_and_coherent instead. If it fails,
> > I think you need to clear the SDHCI_USE_64_BIT_DMA flag.
>
> The sdhci-acpi device is a platform devices created by acpi. dev->dma_mask
> is NULL so dma_set_mask_and_coherent will always fail
> unless I add:
>
> if (!dev->dma_mask)
> dev->dma_mask = &dev->coherent_dma_mask;
>
That's a bug in the ACPI code. Fix that instead of working around it in random
drivers.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
